Politics

A view of the U.S. Supreme Court Building on May 03, 2022 in Washington, DC. In an initial draft maj...
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images News/Getty Images

This Map Illustrates Just How Many States Would Ban Abortion If Roe V. Wade Is Overturned

A majority of states are openly hostile to abortion rights, leaving large swathes of the country without access to reproductive health care.

On Monday, Politico obtained a leaked majority draft opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, indicating that the Supreme Court is poised to strike down Roe v. Wade. In the absence of this decision, which guarantees a right to abortion at the federal level, states, not the federal government, would determine whether citizens have a right to reproductive health care. A map showing which states would ban abortion published by Statista paints a vivid picture of what, exactly, is at stake for millions of Americans.

The Center for Reproductive Rights explains that abortion rights at the state level fall into four basic categories in the absence of Roe:

  • Expanded Access, in which the right to abortion is protected by state laws and/or constitutions as well as by other policies and statues, is the law in California, Connecticut, Hawaii, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington.
  • The right to have an abortion is Protected in Alaska, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, but there are more limitations on access to care than in states with expanded access
  • States Not Protected are those where abortion would not become illegal, but there are no enshrined protections to reproductive health care in state laws or constitutions. Abortion access in these states and territories — Colorado, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, Virginia, and Wyoming — are vulnerable to laws that could subsequently strip that right through legislation.
  • Hostile states — Alabama, American Samoa, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Guam, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, the Northern Mariana Islands, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin — constitute a plurality among these categories. While four of these states’ hostility to abortion legally pre-dates Roe (in other words, laws that are unenforceable due to the 1973 ruling), most have post-Roe laws on the books that would go into effect in the absence of the ruling. While some states, such as Michigan, have taken steps to try to strike down pre-Roe abortion bans, they are, within this category, a minority.

Below, this map from Statista illustrates what would happen throughout the U.S. in the absence of Roe v. Wade, highlighting the fact that many in the south and Midwest would have to travel hundreds of miles to access the nearest abortion clinic.

The majority of the American South would lose access to legal abortion care in the absence of Roe v. Wade.Courtesy of Statista

Regardless of the law, historical evidence shows that the legality of abortion is not the primary driver of abortions: in other words abortions, regardless of whether or not they are legal, will continue. According to the Guttmacher Institute, the number of illegal abortions in the 1950s and 1960s could range from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year. In 1930, abortion was listed as the official cause of death for almost 2,700 women — a staggering 18% of maternal deaths recorded in that year. Furthermore, a study published in Demography found that if an abortion ban were enacted throughout the U.S., maternal mortality — already higher in the United States, especially among Black women, than in any other so-called “developed nation” — would increase by double digits.

While conservatives have hailed this decision, according to the Pew Research Center, a majority of Americans — 59% — believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, including 59% of moderate Republicans and 62% of all women. The World Health Organization (WHO) cites lack of access to safe, timely, affordable, and respectable abortion care as not only a public health concern but a matter of human rights. What’s more, the overturning of Roe v. Wade is expected to have a far greater negative impact on poor women, Black women, and young women.