Clues From The Pineapple In The Confusing JonBenet Ramsey Case Are Confusing
As the 20th anniversary of the still-unsolved JonBenét Ramsey murder approaches, it is reinvigorating speculation over seemingly insignificant details about the case. The 6-year-old pageant star whose name ended up splashed across tabloid headlines for years was found dead in her family's basement the day after Christmas in 1996, and to this day, no one has been charged with her murder. As armchair detectives fire up their televisions for CBS' new true-crime docu-series, The Case of: JonBenét Ramsey, though it's clues like the pineapple in the JonBenét case that highlight some key discrepancies between the Ramsey family's perspectives and the evidence gathered at the crime scene and leave everyone scratching their heads.
First, some background: Following her death, autopsy reports found undigested pineapple in JonBenét's stomach. According to Steven Pitt, a nationally recognized forensic psychiatrist in Arizona who worked on the JonBenét investigation, Patsy had "told investigators her daughter hadn't had any of the tropical fruit in the hours before her disappearance," People reported. "I did not feed JonBenét pineapple. OK?" Patsy asserted when questioned by Boulder authorities, staying true to her previous statement that, after the family returned home that night, her daughter went straight to bed. "I don't know how it got in her stomach," she said.
Investigators later found a bowl of pineapple in the dining room the morning after the murder. When pressed about the new discovery, Patsy responded: "And where this bowl of pineapple came from... I can't recall putting that there." This was problematic to investigators, due to the fact that, upon examining the bowl, they found Patsy's fingerprints. Investigators also found another set of fingerprints on the bowl of pineapple belonging to Burke, JonBenét's older brother who was 9 years old at the time.
It's important to note, though, that the crime scene was not immaculate. In fact, Boulder Detective Lou Smit referred to it as "screwed up" in a 2012 Denver Post blog. Smit noted that, "the house should have been totally shut [after the crime]," implying that this negligence led to misinformation as well as a contaminated crime scene.
Theories about the pineapple are entirely speculative, as the Ramsey family was acquitted in 2008 due to DNA evidence. It does raise questions, though, as to the truthfulness of Patsy's statements, not only regarding the pineapple but in reference to other details, big and small. However, in a statement to Romper, Ramsey attorney L. Lin Wood reiterated that any notion Patsy or any other member of the family had been involved with JonBenét's death was entirely false.
"In terms of the accusations against John and Patsy Ramsey, the Boulder District Attorney, Mary Lacy, publicly exonerated them in 2008 based on irrefutable DNA evidence. She apologized to the family and assured them that in the future, they would be correctly treated as victims," he said. "The days of Ramsey accusations should have ended then and there." He added:
There are multiple avenues by which JonBenét could have gotten and eaten the pineapple, and Patsy insisting that there was no pineapple in the house—when her very fingerprints were found on the bowl—left many confused. For now, as no one was ever charged in JonBenét's death, it seems the mystery remains unsolved.